This does not mean confusables.txt is wrong. It means confusables.txt is a visual-similarity claim that has never been empirically validated at scale. Many entries map characters to the same abstract target under NFKC decomposition (mathematical bold A to A, for instance), and the mapping is semantically correct even if the glyphs look nothing alike. But if you treat every confusables.txt entry as equally dangerous for UI security, you are generating massive false positive rates for 96.5% of the dataset.
DOING IT THE RIGHT WAY。业内人士推荐搜狗输入法2026作为进阶阅读
。关于这个话题，heLLoword翻译官方下载提供了深入分析
$50 UGreen (12,000 mAh)。关于这个话题，Line官方版本下载提供了深入分析
Try unlimited accessOnly $1 for 4 weeks